Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Workaround for clang-linux + GNU stdlib + Boost.Iostreams
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-03 05:25:34

On 01/01/2011 22:35, Bryce Lelbach wrote:
> There's a discrepancy in the definition of wint_t between GCC and some later
> versions of clang (clang defines it as an int, GCC an unsigned int). This
> ends breaking Boost.Iostreams with a GNU GCC compiled version of the GNU stdlib
> and clang (I'll restrain myself from giving the lengthy technical explaination -
> if you have link-time errors with clang + GCC compiled stdlib + Boost.Iostreams,
> this is probably the issue).

How about compiling libstdc++ with clang to avoid the discrepancy

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at