Re: [boost] [ratio] Test failing on trunk

Subject: Re: [boost] [ratio] Test failing on trunk
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-04 12:34:01

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Maddock" <boost.regex_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [ratio] Test failing on trunk

>> I'm using boost::intmax_t and the command included -Wno-long-long.
>>
>> Would boost::long_long_type work better?
> 
> Ah, if you really need intmax_t then you should use it, just in case it's 
> longer than a long long (unlikely, but you never know).  The trouble is, 
> boost::intmax_t may just be a synonym for std::intmax_t which may or may not 
> have the warning suppressed :-(
> 
> So maybe -Wno-long-long (on Darwin as well as GCC) may be the correct 
> approach...

It works on gcc with

        <toolset>gcc:<cxxflags>-Wextra
        <toolset>gcc:<cxxflags>-Wno-long-long
        <toolset>gcc:<cxxflags>-pedantic
 
So I will give a try to 

        <toolset>darwin:<cxxflags>-Wextra
        <toolset>darwin:<cxxflags>-Wno-long-long
        <toolset>darwin:<cxxflags>-pedantic

Thanks,
Vicente