Subject: Re: [boost] [spirit] semantic action for mismatches?
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-10 11:42:12
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> On 1/11/2011 12:15 AM, caustik wrote:
> > It would be a nice addition to the documentation to have
> > some thorough benchmark tests. Any particular ideas on what
> > good tests would be? Maybe even just a note in the FAQs with
> > a suggestion on how tests could be run, and asking for users
> > to contribute, would yield some help from others. I would
> > imagine that there have been a few users who ran their own
> > internal tests before choosing a solution, if they were made
> > aware of the interest in gathering those results, they may
> > volunteer that data.
> I don't agree.
> If it were Spirit vs. other parsers (yacc, ANTLR, etc.), that would be
> meaningful, yes. But if it is spirit vs. xpressive, it will be an
> apple-orange comparison. There are things that are best suited for
> xpressive that spirit can't do and the same the other way around.
> These are different tools with some overlap. Real world uses for both
> tools go beyond this common overlap. Benchmarks that test the common
> denominator are at best for entertainment only. Would you write a
> compiler with xpressive? I don't think so. Would you do search and
> replace with Spirit? Nah.
Where there is overlap, there is a choice. One can make that choice based solely upon convenience and familiarity, out of complete ignorance, or based upon benchmarks that show solutions to common problems that reveal differences in code written, compilation times, and runtime performance.
With benchmarks for various applications of Spirit, there can be yacc, ANTLR, Xpressive, etc. solutions, as appropriate, to assist developers in selecting the right tool.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk