Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
From: Denis Shevchenko (for.dshevchenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-13 10:39:01
13.01.2011 17:25, Vladimir Prus Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑ:
> - The library is not actually ready. In that case, it should not be in that
> table at all.
I agree. If the library is not ready - why should it be in that table?
> - The library author does not have the time for review. In that case, the
> library should also be removed from the list, because Boost is not responsible
> if the author is busy.
> Can we set a policy that:
> - A library can only be added in the review schedule if the author has time in
> near future to have a review, where near future is, say, 3 months.
Hmm... Why 3 months?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk