Re: [boost] Improving review process

Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-13 12:26:22

> - A library can only be added in the review schedule if the author has time in
> near future to have a review, where near future is, say, 3 months.

well, it would be great if the review would actually happen within a time frame 
of 3 months. unfortunately, it is a bit different in reality: the boost.lockfree 
library is on the review queue for more than a year. with 6 reviews per year 
(like in 2010) and 15 libraries earlier in the queue, i don't expect a review to 
happen before 2013. in a way, this is kind of nice since the dependency to 
boost.atomic (c++0x-atomics for c++-98) will hopefully be obsolete since 
compilers may already be reasonably c++0x-compliant.

so a time frame of 3 months is probably more a time frame of 3 years :/

tim

-- 
tim_at_[hidden]
http://tim.klingt.org
Music is the can opener of the soul. It makes you terribly quiet 
inside, makes you aware that there's a roof to your being.
  Henry Miller