Re: [boost] [XInt] Looking for Review Manager (was: Improving review process)

Subject: Re: [boost] [XInt] Looking for Review Manager (was: Improving review process)
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-13 13:47:46

Chad Nelson wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:29:54 +0100
> "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> [...]
>>> Take an example of Xint. There were plenty of comments, suggestion
>>> and review the various time it was "beta'd" on this list asking for
>>> comments. And that's not counting the fact that a arbitrary
>>> precision integer library has traditionally been a perennial topic
>>> of suggestion for GSOC ideas. Yet, almost exactly 6 months to date,
>>> it still hasn't had a review manager assigned. Is that really a lack
>>> of interest in such a library, or more a lack of review managers?
>>
>> I would say a lack of interest of someone that could be a review
>> manager :) IMO, one of the author's role is to look for a review
>> manager between the people having an interest for the library.
> 
> Yes, and I've been remiss in that department. Not for lack of desire,
> just lack of knowledge of how to go about it.
> 
> So here's the request: would someone who's interested in XInt please
> step up and volunteer to be the review manager for it? I'm ready to
> help in any way I can.

How about me? I don't pretend to be an expert in integers, and will
gladly surrender to anybody else interested, but would be happy to
help xint to be reviewed. And yes, I think we can set a date within
next 3 months ;-)

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
Mentor Graphics
[phone]