Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-14 15:23:44
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:13:26 -0700,
> Jeff Garland wrote:
> > Dave Abrahams wrote:
> > > Using a code review tool is an awesome idea. Many reviews are not
> > > attached to code, but you can put review comments in documentation
> > > just as well.
> > Documentation is a bit harder unless you are annotating the document
> > source directly
> Yes, that's what I was suggesting.
> > -- that is, I haven't see a mode in the tool to
> > annotate against 'rendered html'.
http://smartbear.com/codecollab-new.php indicates that one can review URLs:
"Review HTML, Wiki pages, or documents hosted in an Intranet or web-based document management system."
This appears in the context of an image showing a PDF file in a view with comments alongside or overlaid.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk