Re: [boost] the <boost/detail/iomanip.hpp> header (please use it)

Subject: Re: [boost] the <boost/detail/iomanip.hpp> header (please use it)
From: Bryce Lelbach (admin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-14 20:49:09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:12:32 -0800
Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Unfortunately, conforming to the standard isn't
> good enough.  I think you just broke Codegear
> support in some places.

Unfortunately I don't have Codegear available to test with locally. Can you link
me to the regressions you think this has caused? I'm looking through them right
now, not seeing anything.

Feel free to revert at your own discretion. I would argue, though, that by the same
logic, boost::detail::numeric_traits, boost::detail::iterator_traits, etc, shouldn't
be used.

- -- 
Bryce Lelbach aka wash
boost-spirit.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0w/RUACgkQ9cB/V3/s9EzSNgCfc4+WbvjQ31G+uFF/D9SWvHsb
GEgAn1S6EEeXVFwe6TMjvzonByTj/qLz
=mZ8t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----