Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-15 16:22:31

At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:26:00 +0400,
Denis Shevchenko wrote:
> 16.01.2011 00:08, Frédéric Bron пишет:
> > As a user of boost, I find difficult to guess the name of something
> > because for some libraries, stuff is just in boost:: namespace (regex
> > and type traits for example) and for others it is in boost::library::
> > namespace (for example string algorithms). It would help to have a
> > standard naming convention.
> I completely agree. I think that only a simple libraries should be
> located in a namespace boost (for example, boost::mem_fn or
> boost::lexical_cast). All other libraries should be located in own
> namespace boost::own::.

Make that "simple legacy libraries." IMO we've gone past the point
that we can afford to put anything new directly in boost.

Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at