Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Thread] thread::interrupt of the death
From: Gaetano Mendola (mendola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-16 16:17:04


On 16/01/2011 17:47, Dave Abrahams wrote:

> The draft has never had language deeming potential throwing from
> inside a DTOR ill-formed.

Are you sure? I remember to have read the requirement for DTOR no-throw
in the c++0x.

http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#219

> I'm not sure you can say that is the underlying cause. I don't object
> to the change you're proposing, but I don't want to make it "for the
> wrong reasons" or with an expectation that it fixes more than it
> actually does. The other libraries called a function that could throw
> during stack unwinding. That seems like a very fundamental problem to
> me.

Well, I didn't suggest this to fix someone else code.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk