Re: [boost] [assert] static_assert envy

Subject: Re: [boost] [assert] static_assert envy
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 07:55:42

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I'm fine with BOOST_ASSERT_MSG().

+1 for BOOST_ASSERT_MSG().

> Since we are adding assert.hpp I would
> like to see
>
> Â BOOST_ASSERT_IF()
> Â BOOST_ASSERT_IF_MSG()
>
> as well. It is really much clearer to read and maintain than
>
> Â BOOST_ASSERT( !foo() || condition );
>

+1

-- 
Dean Michael Berris
about.me/deanberris