Re: [boost] [assert] static_assert envy

Subject: Re: [boost] [assert] static_assert envy
From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 09:21:55

Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> ...
> 
> 
> 
>> I'm fine with BOOST_ASSERT_MSG(). Since we are adding assert.hpp I would
>> like to see
>>
>>  BOOST_ASSERT_IF()
>>  BOOST_ASSERT_IF_MSG()
>>
>> as well. It is really much clearer to read and maintain than
>>
>>  BOOST_ASSERT( !foo() || condition );
>>
> 
> I like it!
> 
> I'm working on a Boost quality implementation now. Stay tuned.

Should there be BOOST_VERIFY variants also?

Thanks for addressing this Beman.

Jeff