Re: [boost] namespace boost?

Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 12:37:47

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> AMDG
>
> On 1/18/2011 9:17 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Steven Watanabe<watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/15/2011 8:24 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>>
>>>> At Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:12:37 -0500,
>>>> Kim Barrett wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/tuple/doc/design_decisions_rationale.html
>>>>> "For those who are really interested in namespaces"
>>
>> Then I say, "make it match the library name, with a bias towards
>> singular library names."
>>
>
> There's one other way that a user could get a problem.
>
> using namespace boost;
> using namespace boost::tuple;
>
> tuple<int> t;

Okay.  Should we care about that case?  Remember, I'm the one who just
made the plea to remember convenience :-)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com