Subject: Re: [boost] Distributed Development Process (was Re: Development Practices (Proposal Progress))
From: Klaim (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 15:17:32
> "We want to enable the Boost project to scale up to have more than one
> As it is at the moment there is only one Boost C++ Library distribution
> which contains all the accepted libraries."
> IMHO, it's very good idea. But if we have several Boost distributions -
> what if library A depends on library B, but A and B placed in *different*
> - Denis
Isn't it the problem that Ryppl (for a concrete example) tries to solve?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk