Re: [boost] [1.46.0] [units] test_output failing allrelease regressioncompilers

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.46.0] [units] test_output failing allrelease regressioncompilers
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-18 15:48:44

On 1/18/2011 11:40 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rene Rivera"<grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
> To:<boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] [1.46.0] [units] test_output failing allrelease regressioncompilers
>
>
>> On 1/17/2011 3:35 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
>>> I don't know if this is an easy task, but it will be great to have some statistics as:
>>
>> Nothing is an easy task when it comes to the current test report
>> generation.. Even if you happen to be an uber-expert XSLT programmer.
>
> How can I help?

I guess I should have been more clear.. I'm not an uber-expert XSLT 
programmer. And have very little understanding of the details of the 
current XSLT regression results processing. And I'm not sure anyone does 
any more. So if you wanted to tackle the current XSLT reports, all I can 
do is point you to where they are:

<http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/tools/regression/xsl_reports/>

And to say that, when I used to run those scripts, it was the 
"build_results.sh" wrapper that I used. Which in turn runs some other 
wrapper written in Python. Which then runs a variety of XSLT scripts.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail