Re: [boost] Distributed Development Process (was Re: Development Practices (Proposal Progress))

Subject: Re: [boost] Distributed Development Process (was Re: Development Practices (Proposal Progress))
From: Denis Shevchenko (for.dshevchenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 03:01:26

19.01.2011 11:50, Dean Michael Berris пишет:
> The reasoning for this is so that there can be more release managers
> that manage just part of the whole Boost library. This alludes to the
> similarity with Linux subsystems where you have maintainers that
> basically ensure that the subsystems they maintain are up to snuff.
+1. I think, it's very good idea.
> ...if you just want to get for example Spirit and all the libraries it depends
> on and extensions that build upon Spirit only, then you get that
> distribution.
Okay. And how much distributions we'll have?

- Denis