Subject: Re: [boost] Distributed Development Process (was Re: Development Practices (Proposal Progress))
From: Denis Shevchenko (for.dshevchenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 03:01:26
19.01.2011 11:50, Dean Michael Berris Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐµÑ:
> The reasoning for this is so that there can be more release managers
> that manage just part of the whole Boost library. This alludes to the
> similarity with Linux subsystems where you have maintainers that
> basically ensure that the subsystems they maintain are up to snuff.
+1. I think, it's very good idea.
> ...if you just want to get for example Spirit and all the libraries it depends
> on and extensions that build upon Spirit only, then you get that
Okay. And how much distributions we'll have?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk