Subject: Re: [boost] [general] What will string handling in C++ look like in the future [was Always treat ... ]
From: Alexander Lamaison (awl03_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-21 04:37:35
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:26:35 -0800, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 07:43 AM, Alexander Lamaison wrote:
>> I imagine you wouldn't have UTF-16 and UTF-32 string being passed about as
>> a matter for course. For instance, a UTF-16 string should only be used
>> just before calling a Windows API call.
>> If this is the case, it makes sense to make the common case (UTF-8 string)
>> have a nice name like boost::string and the others which are used for
>> special situations can have something less snappy like boost::u16string and
> What would you use for a regular string where you just had, essentially
> a vector of char, wchar_t, char8_t, char16_t, char32_t, or unsigned
> char, but didn't care about encoding? I want to differentiate between
> this case and the case where I know that there's a particular encoding.
> A lot of times you just know you got a string from one system call and
> you're passing it to another and you don't care about encoding.
Good point! boost::u8string then?
-- Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer (http://www.swish-sftp.org)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk