Subject: Re: [boost] [config][pathscale] Configurations for older versions
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-22 07:09:11
>> This is a recent configuration change done by design and has been
>> extensively tested with the new version. EKOPath 4 was just released
>> and we're already in discussion with Sandia to get the test machine
>> updated asap. Please be patient while that's worked out.
That only fixes our regression tests, it doesn't help users who may still be
using version 3.x.
I also note that the logic in the pathscale.hpp is completely backwards - it
should be something like:
#if NAME <= VERSION1
// define defect macros for version 1 or less
#if NAME <= VERSION2
// define defect macros for version 2 or less
#if NAME >= VERSION1
// define optional feature macros for version 1 newer
#if NAME >= VERSION2
// define optional feature macros for version 2 newer
If pathscale is still a flavor of gcc then I agree we should probably revert
this for this release, and fix properly for the next one.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk