Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-24 06:59:27
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Artyom <artyomtnk_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> From: Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Nevin Liber <nevin_at_[hidden]> Â wrote:
>> > Eliminating #2 but not Â #1 would force c_str() to make a (possibly tracked)
>> > copy, to avoid #2 on Â its internal buffer (due to the trailing '\0' byte).
>> Who says we need a Â c_str()?
> Almost everybody who uses any kind of API that does not has direct uses
> of this string and this is as almost every API around...
Right, but what's keeping that person from creating an std::string
from this hypothetical `boost::string` if they really need a c_str()?
-- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk