Re: [boost] GSoC 2011 - Do we need to starting thinking about it?

Subject: Re: [boost] GSoC 2011 - Do we need to starting thinking about it?
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-24 13:24:37

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Sutton" <asutton.list_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] GSoC 2011 - Do we need to starting thinking about it?

>> I agree with you, it is better if the the proposals are limited to the
>> *expectations*. Up to the student to make its own proposal. In this way we
>> would be able to evaluate the motivation and capabilities of the student
>> better.
>>
> 
> Yes... reviewing dozens of "I will do xxx" proposals is a particularly
> frustrating process :)

Could the following example be enough?

Boost.Thread compliance with C++0x standard
=================================
Adapt the current Boost.Thread interface to the C++0x standard proposal, for C++98 and C++0x compilers.

Best,
Vicente