Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-27 14:20:11

Next message: Boris Kolpackov: "Re: [boost] Interest in a simple buffer abstraction?"
Previous message: Jeff Flinn: "Re: [boost] [static_assert.hpp] Add BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"

On 1/27/2011 12:30 PM, John Maddock wrote:
> This conversation is all hunky dory, but I haven't seen an answer to the
> original question yet - other than that docs changes are OK to merge....

Sorry.. Wasn't totally following the start of the thread.. Now that I
reread I'm still confused. What are *all* the changes that need to get
merged?

Scatterly-brain-hampered-ly yours ;-)

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail

Next message: Boris Kolpackov: "Re: [boost] Interest in a simple buffer abstraction?"
Previous message: Jeff Flinn: "Re: [boost] [static_assert.hpp] Add BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT_MSG?"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [1.46] Last few merges needed?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk