Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-28 07:07:23
On 28.01.2011 12:12, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> So what if your "text" just dealt with the immutable strings
> underneath? Would you still object to that?
No, if you have a good immutable byte sequence class, using it to
implement text is probably a good choice.
Not that I care how text is implemented. As long as it's convenient and
doesn't sacrifice an undue amount of performance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk