Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: Matus Chochlik (chochlik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-28 07:17:23
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Artyom <artyomtnk_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> From: Patrick Horgan
>> > Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> > So for lack of a more creative name, I'll call it `istring` Â which
>> > conveys immutability and string semantics.
>> Apple might come Â after you. Â How about calling it immutable. Â That's not a
> Apple does not have trademark on Â "^i\w+" :-)
> Apple's trademarks: http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html
> So I can safely register a trademark on iFool and of course on istring.
> (I'm not a lawyer and don't see this as legal advice, etc.)
I'm not saying that this (istring) is the same case, but see
Apple is being very sensitive about things called iSomething
regardless if they own it as a trademark or not.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk