Re: [boost] [string] proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] [string] proposal
From: David Bergman (David.Bergman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-28 13:33:59

C++ String Theory? :-) I like it, perhaps it could transcend scientific fields, this theory.

/David

On Jan 28, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Dean Michael Berris
> <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 
>> So the interface I was thinking about (and suggesting) is a lot more
>> minimal than what rope or std::string have exposed. I think when I do
>> finish that design document (with rationale) it would be clear why I
>> would like to keep it immutable and why I would prefer it still be
>> called a string.
>> 
>> Let me finish that document -- expect something over the weekend. :)
>> 
> 
> And I stopped before I write too much -- the initial version is
> already up: https://github.com/downloads/mikhailberis/cpp-string-theory/cpp-string-theory.pdf
> -- I'll give it more information and the actual interfaces and
> implementation as soon as I get some Z's. :)
> 
> -- 
> Dean Michael Berris
> about.me/deanberris
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost