Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 09:05:38
On 1/31/2011 7:46 AM, Christophe Henry wrote:
>> As of recent, we had quite a lot of discussion about process. In true
>> open-source spirit, it was a fairly open discussion, with everybody
>> offering their perspectives and experience. However, while we surely
>> learned many things, it does not seem like we're going anywhere.
>> For a quick experiment, I tried to assess whether the discussion actually
>> reflects the needs of Boost developers, so I created a table of Boost
>> developers sorted by the number of commits in 2010. It is here:
>> It seems that 5 top Boost comitters did not participate much in recent
>> discussions. And going down the list, it seems like many of active developers
>> did not say anything, while most of discussions is fueled by folks who
>> don't commit much.
Not that it invalidates your points.. But there's a more comprehensive
list at <https://www.ohloh.net/p/boost/contributors>. But you will note
that many of the top contributors are active in the process discussions.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk