Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-31 11:38:17
On 1/31/2011 5:12 AM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 10:10, John Maddock<boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> * The testers machine builds it's own test results pages - ideally these
>> should go into some form of version control as well so we can roll back and
>> see what broke when.
>> * When a tester first starts testing they would add a short meta-description
>> to a script, and run the script to generate the test results index pages. ie
>> there would be no need for a separate machine collecting and processing the
>> * The test script should run much of the above *in parallel* if requested.
> Is anyone willing to work on something like this? Everyone seems a bit
> scared of the testing scripts, although I thnk Rene is working on a
> new reporting system.
I suspect that this is largely a matter of
unfamiliarity. I translated most of the
report generation xsl scripts into C++ last
year, and I didn't find them that hard to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk