Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-01 20:57:21
On 2/1/2011 7:21 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:12:45 -0600,
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> That is, I don't think we can live without full trunk testing.
> I'm curious why not. I'm fairly sure I don't want any resources wasted on it
> for my libraries.
Because in the three testing scenarios I mentioned it would be the only
one to give you fully integrated testing without being in the release.
Of course a full dependency integrated testing of an individual lib with
a release base could be a substitute for full trunk testing. But for
some components full dependency integrated testing might devolve back to
close to full trunk testing. But again, this all depends on how close or
far future procedures are to the current ones.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk