Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Process discussions
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-02 02:20:38

Next message: Kresimir Fresl: "Re: [boost] Need help identifying present and past Boost authors"
Previous message: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)"
In reply to: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Process discussions"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Process discussions"

Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:12:45 -0600,
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>
>> That is, I don't think we can live without full trunk testing.
>
> I'm curious why not. I'm fairly sure I don't want any resources
> wasted on it for my libraries.

There are times I would like to add more tests but am reluctant
to do so because of the increased burden on the testing infrasture.

Robert Ramey

Next message: Kresimir Fresl: "Re: [boost] Need help identifying present and past Boost authors"
Previous message: Thomas Heller: "Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)"
In reply to: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Process discussions"
Next in thread: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Process discussions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk