Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)

Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-02 17:59:37

At Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:41:50 -0800,
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> 
> I hadn't looked at the latest version of Phoenix until just now, so I didn't
> realize that so much had changed --- thank you very much for directing my
> attention towards it!  It looks like it might actually fit the bill for most of
> my uses, so when I get a chance I will experiment with using it to replace
> Boost.Local in my code.  There are some cases where the function body is
> sufficiently non-trivial that translating everything into the special syntax of
> Phoenix might be a pain, but I could very well be wrong.  I'll let you know what
> I think about how how well it solves the problem I faced versus Boost.Local
> after I've tried it out.

That'll be very interesting information.  If you can get compilation-time
results as part of it, doubly so.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com