Subject: Re: [boost] Case study: Boost.Local versus Boost.Phoenix
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-03 23:48:47
On 2/4/2011 12:29 PM, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
> Local should be viewed as being complimentary to Phoenix rather competing with it, and it
> should be evaluated on its own merits.
I think I have to agree with this. In as much as we have Boost-FOREACH
in addition to std::for_each, Boost.Local is a good and useful library
that is simple, practical and effective enough as it is.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk