Re: [boost] Case study: Boost.Local versus Boost.Phoenix

Subject: Re: [boost] Case study: Boost.Local versus Boost.Phoenix
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-04 13:03:35

Christian Holmquist <c.holmquist_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I've made a habit (which have been widely adapted by others at my workplace)
> to make local lambdas like this:
>
> void my_function()
> {
>    foo_type foo;
>    bar_type bar;
>
>   struct {
>       foo_type &foo_;
>       bar_type &bar_;
>       void operator()(a_type a) const
>       {
>            foo_(a);
>            bar_(a);
>       }
>    } lambda = { foo, bar} ;
>
>    for_each(as.begin(),as.end(),lambda);
>
> }
>
> I don't know if that's standard compliant, but works perfectly fine in MSVC.

It's not legal C++03, but is legal C++0x.

Anthony
-- 
Author of C++ Concurrency in Action     http://www.stdthread.co.uk/book/
just::thread C++0x thread library             http://www.stdthread.co.uk
Just Software Solutions Ltd       http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976