Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)

Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Loïc Joly (loic.actarus.joly_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-04 17:04:05

Le 04/02/2011 16:12, Mathias Gaunard a écrit :
>
> All of this still needs to happen at namespace scope.
> The problem with declaring those things at namespace scope is that 
> they necessarily become far away from the lambda function you want to 
> write.
>
AFAIK, this will no longer be true with C++1x, and already false with 
some compilers.

-- 
Loïc