Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)

Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-04 17:43:06

On 2/5/11 6:03 AM, Alexander Nasonov wrote:

>> As far is a am concerned, I still find this syntax overly verbose.
>> I do realize though that this is just a toy example. For better comparison,
>> Here is how the same thing would like in Boost.Phoenix:
>
> Steven and I were playing with different syntaxes few years ago
>
> We came up with something like this:
>
>      void BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION
>          ( BOOST_BIND((factor)(&sum)), double num )
>      {
>          sum += factor * num;
>          std::clog<<   "Summed:"<<   sum<<   std::endl;
>      }
>      BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_DECL(add)
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/168612/focus=168694

That is nice!

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net