Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-04 17:43:06
On 2/5/11 6:03 AM, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> As far is a am concerned, I still find this syntax overly verbose.
>> I do realize though that this is just a toy example. For better comparison,
>> Here is how the same thing would like in Boost.Phoenix:
> Steven and I were playing with different syntaxes few years ago
> We came up with something like this:
> void BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION
> ( BOOST_BIND((factor)(&sum)), double num )
> sum += factor * num;
> std::clog<< "Summed:"<< sum<< std::endl;
That is nice!
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk