Re: [boost] GCC 4.6.x + Boost.Signals == failure

Subject: Re: [boost] GCC 4.6.x + Boost.Signals == failure
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-05 04:20:39

Bryce Lelbach aka wash wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Who is the Boost.Signals maintainer? Boost.Signals fails to build against
> a
> stage-3 GCC build (GCC 4.6.x, r169444) due to an ambigious call to the
> erase
> method of a std::map<>.
> 
> Do we have a GCC 4.6.x tester? This compiler is in the Debian- and Ubuntu-
> distribution these days. According to the regressions page, we don't
> appear to
> have a GCC 4.6.x tester... this would be nice to have.
> 
> 

We have Win7-x64 jc-bell.com  who is testing gcc-mingw-4.6.0 on trunk.

BTW, no errors for Boost.Signal in last report rev 68358. Which version of
Boost.Signals fails?
Vicente
-- 
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/GCC-4-6-x-Boost-Signals-failure-tp3261517p3261615.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.