Subject: Re: [boost] Case study: Boost.Local versus Boost.Phoenix
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-05 16:08:05
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Gregory Crosswhite
> The error messages usually aren't that bad for Boost.Local, and the syntax
> is simple enough that I found it relatively easy to figure out what went
> wrong compared to many other libraries.
That is also my _personal_ experience. Anyone else that has _used_
Boost.Local and can comment on the complexity of both (1) error
messages and (2) parenthesized syntax? I am VERY curious :)
Thanks a lot!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk