Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-06 16:02:03
At Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:32:06 -0500,
Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> Agreed. I think we discussed the syntax stuff enough.
Well, just one thing I'd like to add: it would be a shame if your Boost library
doesn't provide alternate macros usable by anyone who is willing to depend on
the C99 preprocessor, that take advantage of variadics.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk