Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-06 16:02:03

At Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:32:06 -0500,
Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> Agreed. I think we discussed the syntax stuff enough.

Well, just one thing I'd like to add: it would be a shame if your Boost library
doesn't provide alternate macros usable by anyone who is willing to depend on
the C99 preprocessor, that take advantage of variadics.



Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at