Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] GCC 4.6.x + Boost.Signals == failure
From: wash (admin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-06 20:13:01


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:07:34 -0800
Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> a) Please check defined(__GNUC__) first to avoid warnings

K

> b) __GNUC__ >= 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6 is a little
> silly, since it will be false for gcc 5.0.

Good point

> c) Will the patch work when C++0x support is disabled?

No, should probably check for the G++ detection macro as well.

- --
Bryce Lelbach aka wash
boost-spirit.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1PRx0ACgkQ9cB/V3/s9EwBKACdHgRB3bnEeyZwkkzSNMMPxNVW
mW8AnjIJ1YseDCvHpuogbIETw+B7JfZR
=I5H4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk