Subject: Re: [boost] Rave for proposed Boost.Local (functions)
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-06 23:15:29
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.
> On 2/6/2011 5:46 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.
>> <jhellrung_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2011 9:17 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>>>> I am posting here the code generated by the macros which might help
>>>> curious readers in spotting costly operations performed by Boost.Local
>>>> (if there are any). This of course does not include the preprocessing
>>>> time. (I hope it's not too much code... just try to get passed the
>>>> typeof noise at the beginning...)
>>> Is the use of Boost.Typeof optional? I.e., can I just provide the types
>>> the arguments and bound variables myself?
>> No but I think you can simply use a normal (not bound) local function
>> parameters to do this:
> So Boost.Typeof is necessary to bind variables...?
Yes. Boost.Typeof is only used to automatically deduce the type of the
bound variables. I will double check that if you bind no variable then
no typeof code is generated by the macros.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk