Subject: Re: [boost] Subject: Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library starts tomorrow
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-07 23:14:37
On 2/7/2011 11:09 AM, Vicente Botet wrote:
> private functions like invalid_handle don't need to be documented. Shouldn't
> the nested impl class be private?
impl is private. I usually wrap private members
in \cond \endcond to avoid this. It should probably
be fixed in the doxygen to boostbook conversion, however.
> class pistream : public std::istream, public boost::noncopyable
> * inheritance missing on the documentation.
It's lost by doxygen. I don't know whether there's an
easy way to fix it.
> * constructor must be documented explicit
Fixed in trunk BoostBook.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk