Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] Should recursive_directory_iterator follow directory symlinks by default?
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-09 13:15:26
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 08:43 AM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> > Beman Dawes wrote:
> >> I'd like to add an option to either following
> >> directory symlinks or not. Which should the default
> >> be?
> > *nix follows symlinks by default. One must use special
> > APIs to recognize and inspect symlinks. I should think
> > consistency across platforms would be good.
> That isn't really true. There isn't any POSIX function for
> recursive directory walking. It is simply a matter of whether
> lstat or stat is used to check whether directory entries are
> themselves directories. As one example, GNU find does not
> follow symlinks by default.
Right, but I meant that normal file APIs follow symlinks, so doing so during directory iteration would seem consistent.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk