Subject: Re: [boost] encouraging review managers -- was Re: Review Request:Variadic Macro Data library
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 00:05:57
Gordon Woodhull wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Edward Diener wrote:
> Fair enough. This doesn't worry me very much, but
> - I think there should be a way to challenge a review afterward,
> through the Wizards and/or list as appropriate.
Actually there is already a mechanism for addressing this. I
know this for a fact because I personally availed myself of it.
The procedure can be summarized as follows:
a) Understand and accept the objections raised the review which resulted
in the library being rejected,
b) redo the code/documentation
Worked for me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk