Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready for review?
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 04:22:11
Hi Vicente, Wizards,
> I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
I'm glad about the fixed links and review manager volunteers that came out of this survey.
Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this...
Second Call: Are your libraries ready for review?
Creasing (Sequence Properties)
I know I haven't seen a few of these people for a long time & I think one or two might have been discouraged by the informal debate.
There are another seven where the author replied to this thread or some other recent query, who *definitely* need review managers:
(depends on Atomic)
(depends on Context)
Quaternions, Vectors, Matrices (QVM)
Variadic Macro Data
Aspiring authors, please take up the mantle of review manager!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk