|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library
From: Max Sobolev (macsmr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 07:33:18
On 20.02.2011 1:58, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
> Sounds like you have a competing library?
> Sounds like you have a competing library?
accidentally, yes :0)
> Would you consider merging?
no, it's ineffective: much simpler write a new library from scratch,
because the proposed library is not complete and have a "leaky wrapper"
design in essential.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk