Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 07:49:10
I actually dig the EDSL way :) It conveys enough semantic information
adn is clear to w/e is actually tryign to work with process. I wonder if
errors can't be caught by analyzign the whoel expression before hand.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk