Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 08:40:28

> However what you suggest is terribly cryptic.

I beg to differ

> It may be seems to be clear but actually is is very wired
> construction that hard to understand and would likely
> lead to very bad error messages.
>
> Especially because
>
>    rm [ "foo.txt" % "bar.txt" ]
>
> Would not work...

Hmmm, i wonder if turning const char[N] into a custom proto terminal is 
not enough in fact. just have operator[] waits for a process_expression 
afterward.