Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-21 08:40:28
> However what you suggest is terribly cryptic.
I beg to differ
> It may be seems to be clear but actually is is very wired
> construction that hard to understand and would likely
> lead to very bad error messages.
> Especially because
> rm [ "foo.txt" % "bar.txt" ]
> Would not work...
Hmmm, i wonder if turning const char[N] into a custom proto terminal is
not enough in fact. just have operator waits for a process_expression
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk