Subject: Re: [boost] [config] request for BOOST_NO_FWD_STD_DECLARATION
From: Ilya Sokolov (ilyasokol_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-24 23:55:44
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:00:05 +0500, Stewart, Robert
> Ilya Sokolov wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:20:14 +0500, Stewart, Robert
>> <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > The implementer may declare std types with template
>> > parameters beyond those named in the standard, provided the
>> > extras are defaulted so the types work as if they didn't
>> > have the extra template parameters.
>> No. See
> I think the committee was disingenuous to declare the standard clear as
> written when Pete Becker got it wrong: http://bit.ly/hXpupO.
+1. Looks like 'clear as written' means something else for the committee ).
> Still, that issue does prove me wrong. Thanks for the clarification.
> Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
> Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
> Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk