Subject: Re: [boost] Phoenix v3 review
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-25 07:54:56
On 25/02/11 13:35, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> It already behaves like the proto generator functions you described.
>> Maybe the instantiation of a phoenix::function<F> also add
>> significantly to compile time and binary size. These were the numbers
>> I was interested in.
> Exactly. Phoenix functions are not proto terminals. I agree with
> Thomas, I'd like to see the numbers first before jumping to a conclusion.
The problem comes from the inevitable code instanciation of this
template class when you actually do a lot of function<stuff> evewhere.
see your std bindings for ex.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk