Subject: Re: [boost] Phoenix v3 review
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-25 08:38:43
On 25/02/2011 14:13, Thomas Heller wrote:
>> It would be nice to have a tool like Proto but that was extended to deal
>> with more C++ language constructs. Even if the syntax to call them requires
>> transforming those constructs to expressions with a DSEL of its own, at
>> least there can be a canonic way to do so.
> This already exists inside proto, there are basic language constructs
> and it is easily extensible (through proto transforms).
There is no proto::if_, proto::while_ etc.
The way I see it, Phoenix could provide the canonical way to represent
statements in Proto-based DSELs.
> You can hook up your DSEL into phoenix by extending meta_grammar and
> Maybe a small example in the documentation would be helpful to explain
> how it really works ...
Since I don't see how that is possible with the current design, I would
appreciate an example indeed.
default_actions can only be specialized per node tag, not per domain.
And I don't want to have to duplicate all the Proto node tags for my own
DSEL like Phoenix does.
I also don't see why the grammar should be affected. It's purely an
evaluation thing, the Phoenix language itself should not be affected.
> Preprocessed phoenix still needs to resolve all the operator overloads.
> The other points you mentioned will be reworked.
AFAIK, overload resolution is constant-time on all compilers. The
compile-time slowdown should only come from parsing a larger amount of code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk