Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-28 03:10:20

Next message: Joshua Boyce: "Re: [boost] [filesystem v3] [iostreams] [interprocess] no windows access to memory mapped file"
Previous message: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [enums] Interest in an alternative emulation of scoped enums classes"
In reply to: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"

Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Before I spend 2+ weeks updating Boost.Local docs... can you please
> express an opinion about Boost.Local new and simplified syntax?
>
>

Thanks Lorenzo for trying to make uniform both interfaces. IMO the
interface is enough clear and allows moving from one to the other in a
simple way.

Good luck,
Vicente

-- 
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-What-do-you-think-of-the-new-syntax-tp3327422p3327593.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Joshua Boyce: "Re: [boost] [filesystem v3] [iostreams] [interprocess] no windows access to memory mapped file"
Previous message: Vicente Botet: "Re: [boost] [enums] Interest in an alternative emulation of scoped enums classes"
In reply to: Lorenzo Caminiti: "[boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk