Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] sharing memory between 32 bit and 64 bit Windows processes
From: Arno SchÃ¶dl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-28 05:43:35

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Previous message: Ion GaztaÃ±aga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] sharing memory between 32 bit and 64 bit Windows processes"
In reply to: Ion GaztaÃ±aga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] sharing memory between 32 bit and 64 bit Windows processes"

> > size_type/difference_type replacements... Feel free to call if you
> > want a quick answer to a question.

> I just replied the ticket before reading your ping ;-) I've merged it
> into my working copy (which contains some other Boost.Move official
> acceptance changes), and I'm modifying the rbtree_best_fit's modulo
> arithmetic issue, since I consider it a design flaw.

Outstanding!

Arno

--
Dr. Arno SchÃ¶dl | aschoedl_at_[hidden]
Technical Director
think-cell Software GmbH | Chausseestr. 8/E | 10115 Berlin | Germany
http://www.think-cell.com | phone +49 30 666473-10 | US phone +1 800 891 8091
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 85229 | European Union VAT Id DE813474306
Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl

Next message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [local] What do you think of the new syntax?"
Previous message: Ion GaztaÃ±aga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] sharing memory between 32 bit and 64 bit Windows processes"
In reply to: Ion GaztaÃ±aga: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] sharing memory between 32 bit and 64 bit Windows processes"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk